case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice to your legal rights with the parties, arising out of the over marriage from the few, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. As an illustration, a ruling within a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or girl usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they can do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
13. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is set up as well as the employee is found guilty after because of process of law, it's the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the assorted penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct will not be enough although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful fashion. Read more
However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to get action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of click here law. Police shall also be certain regard on the family drop in accordance with regulation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security from the house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has actually been accomplished. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated over. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight provided to any reported judgment could depend on the reputation of both the reporter and also the judges.[7]
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of your United States and this State.
ten. Without touching the merits from the case from the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, such once-a-year increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to generally be made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it suitable into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified from the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided because of the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
ten. Based within the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't regarded as maintainable and it is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case regulation by setting a different precedent of higher authority. This could occur several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress in the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage isn't extensive, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.